The Jordan Eason incident
Link: Instapundit.com -.
I absolutely refuse to call this "Easongate". But because "whatever-gate" is so lame. Geez. In any case Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit is still concerned. Guess he hasn't read Jeff Jarvis at BuzzMachine who appears to think Jordan has fully explained himself. Please don't tell me you're renaming your blog "buzzMSMachine" Jeff. I don't think Michelle Malkin is satisfied yet either. I'm certainly not.
Update: Jeff Jarvis kindly commented on my post and I see that I was a bit quick to interpret his remarks the way I did. He was indeed trying to understand the explanation Eason gave, not simply accepting it.




I don't say he fully explained himself. I tried to understand his explanation, which is different.
Posted by: Jeff Jarvis | February 10, 2005 at 06:42 AM